littoral strike ship

I live on the shores of the Solent & can tell immediately at night when a Point Class vessel is passing by the extremely loud engine noise, container ships, tankers & cruise liners are much quieter. There is a valid argument that AORs and other auxiliaries should be built with a load bearing deck, capable of supporting as many containers and/or vehicles as stability calculations and tie down points allow for, and that this deck should be accessible by (a) crane(s), built into the ship and possibly (assuming no major design compromises are needed) a ramp that is also built into the ship (preferably connecting to the flight deck as well), but. The ability for S2S hovercraft to operate off the back steel beach would negate the need for well docks and provide a good capability. It is also likely T31 would be out and about whilst LSS would be in port. It’s not that long ago the RN was fighting to save the Albion class, which spend a lot of time tied up. This is not a gamble I’d recommend for the RN/RFA for any new class other than possibly as a one off replacement for Argus, certainly not as a sweeping replacement for the RFA as a whole. Key point: The LCS is a terrible ship that no one knows what to do with. Both are quite complex electrically/mechanically and use a lot of composites as both primary structure and skin, it will be interesting to see how they handle and repair damage. What I dont understand is why we don’t take this even further forward and add in the stores elements that the KD JLSS has and then create a much larger fleet that covers solid stores, HADR, amphib, hospital, vehicle movement etc.. Earlier this year the UK announced the accelerated development of a new Future Littoral Strike Ship concept for the Royal Navy, a globally deployable class of ships capable of operations from crisis support to full-on combat. A newly completed 4100 RoRo vessel is alongside in Germany at present and could be fitted out with accommodation block and other modifications at a shipyard in Poland. A ship we have already bought and paid for! We did have hundreds of lynx helicopters though, we should have kept some for other duties! Home | Staying ahead in the electronic warface game, The sub hunters: Guarding against undersea threats, How the US Army plans to stay ahead of the electronic warfare game, The next frontier of military communications, Future military rifles: alternative small arms technologies, The South African Army’s firepower on display, High-flying woman: Q&A with the RAF’s first female Air Marshal, Future Littoral Strike Ship: regaining the Royal Navy’s global reach. Each of the two current davits are serviced by a gantry crane with space for at least three craft each. Is this too much to hope for? Also you can potentially combine lpd and ro-ro with mexeflote to get stuff ashore by landing craft. Aside from skis being useless for a naval helicopter, stripping out equipment from a helicopter meant for recon and attack is costing you the capability you need for a modern platform. If you want to configure these things for humanitarian disaster relief, you may want to add: 1. The U.S. Navy Littoral Combat Ship USS Gabrielle Giffords fired an anti-ship missile at a target vessel during an Oct. 1, 2019 exercise off the coast of Guam. So I think we should have a 5 product helicopter force of: 1. I too like the concept, but as taxpayer funded ships, surely they have to be built in Britain. Currently, we have 237 helicopters in service (not included handfuls of various different types used for specific tasks). Ok, I get the concept. They are exerting British influence through greater forward presence. The U.S. Navy littoral combat ship Sioux City arrives at its home port in Mayport, Fla. And wildcat holds less troops than lynx! Enough to make sure every RN ship can embark at least one Wildcat, and to make 16 Air Assault Brigade actually air mobile without taking every single helicopter we have. Those extensive modifications, as well as contractual obligations under the Strategic Sealift PFI agreement, may sway the MoD into simply buying new vessels or entering a new agreement with a third-party supplier such as Prevail for the vessels, crew and sustainment provision. A full suite of communications facilities and antenna arrays can be added subject to customer requirements. Surely the answer is a version of the Bay Class, but with hanger for 4-6 Merlin sized helicopters, as per the Spanish and Dutch versions. Just enough to barrier the LSS against threats and to give consequences to any interference. Sorry if i didn’t clarify, my intention would be: double the existing FAA and AAC Wildcat fleets (+60 aircraft), replace Gazelle with Wildcat (-36 old aircraft, +40 new), and replace Puma with commando-spec Merlin HC4s and massively expand our medium lift capability (-24 old, +80 new). Or at least it will end up being the replacement for something rather than a needed increase in hull numbers. The command & control, helicopter and boat operations capability would make it ideally suited for this role. If these simply replaced the Points then you’d increase capability on the quiet and offer the potential for forward spec ops basing within an established requirement and without encroached on amphibious capability; they’d be roaming the seas doing work anyway and there’d be more of them, odds are you’re more likely to have one close to hand when it’s needed. not PFI). It could good fortune and the frigate is the correct place but it could also be hundreds or thousands of miles away. It would be nice to have enough medium lift helicopters to fully support 16 Air Assault Brigade on a permanent basis, so enough helicopters for 3 battalions of infantry. Lebanon and Yemen. It would make sense to add the h-force option to give them weapons. The defense secretary envisions these ships to form part of two Littoral Strike Groups complete with escorts, support vessels and helicopters. Since the ministerial announcement, there has been limited further official comment about the FLSS concept, although the previous First Sea Lord was enthusiastic about “refreshing our littoral strike credentials” when speaking at RUSI in May 2019. The Royal Navy already has experience operating similar ships in the Point class of roll-on/roll-off (RO-RO) strategic sealift vessels, which share design aspects with the Ocean Trader. Carry and deliver heavy armour. This is certainly not intended to take on a warship and if the threat of that was there it would have a proper escort in tow. We only have 62 at the moment. The MRV can be raised to Level 1 heli-ops, day, night and all-weather if specified by the customer. Simple twin diesels will propel the ship up to 20 knots with an endurance of 28 days and 10,000nm. One company, Prevail Partners, has already put forward its multi-role vessel solution for the FLSS requirement, with company sources noting that its solution is a “highly mobile logistic and helicopter base [that] enables nations to project power, carrying out the most time-sensitive special forces missions and managing threats at range with swift and decisive action”. Small boats can be launched and recovered, supporting insertions of special forces units via the coast or waterways, as well as supporting boarding parties to storm other vessels. My intent is to be helpful…. Then gazelles with wildcats? I fully accept that you guys will deploy 3 Bde first, and that is likely to take all of your amph assets. Royal Marine Offshore Raiding Craft (ORC), workboats, and potentially UUVs could all be handled by the sophisticated davits. I don’t know the reason the RAF gave all of their Merlins to the navy, but if it was purely political then I can’t see any reason they wouldn’t readopt it. The Future Littoral Strike Ship (FLSS) concept announced earlier in 2019 forms part of the UK government's efforts to regain its global influence, effectively giving the Royal Navy forward-deployed assets with special forces and Royal Marine commandos onboard that can be maintained at very high readiness in case of emergencies or conflict. I believe that Gazelle is being replaced with H149m, as variants are already in service with joint helicopter training fleet. Isn’t there a risk of the vehicle deck flooding, with those MBTs in rough seas, are those doors really strong enough to take a knock from one of those? Otherwise they may need to be stored in the main hangar which would impinge on manned flight operations. 2. Not. With self-tensioning, sophisticated wave motion compensation, shock absorbers and hydraulic guiding they can recover boats in high sea states. With its top attack mode, it should be able to take out tanks as well. So something more substantial is required that pushes out the engagement range. The U.S. Navy is close to receiving its 21st Littoral Combat Ship. So it’s either going to be operating just beyond the horizon or close to shore. I have also taken into consideration the actual requirement of the navy (T45 can house 2 Merlins) a Karel Doorman Joint support vessel can hanger 6 and I am proposing a class of 8 of these. Also as you say if we want to vikings etc. It’s going to be highly unlikely that a carrier or ground based aircraft are going to be available. You might want to consider Apache too, but that’s by-the-by. Such a design could easily be adapted to provide more medical facilities and one basic design could cover the littoral strike, hospital ship, landing and aviation training roles. The RN abandoned LSLs which are basically small ro-ros due to issues getting them close enough to the shore. The Bay class are less the 15 years old, the won’t come up for replacement for at least another 15 years. 2. Skis would be far cheaper and that’s just one thing. One of the groups will be based “East of Suez” in the Indo-Pacific region, and one “West of Suez” to support operations in the Mediterranean, Atlantic and the Baltic seas. That doesn’t convince me (not that my convincing counts for anything lol). Carry and deliver heavy construction plant, including things like heavy bulldozers, large cranes, mobile quarry kit etc. I would also say 6-8 davits minimum which I think would just about fit. The command and communication facilities would also be more capable. I do like the concept as this is essentially a poor mans Karel Doorman, and there is nothing wrong with that. Exactly, Kilo doesn’t know ! As I have been saying for several years, the simple solution would be to use the Tide class hull and replicate it to produce the Albion and RFA replacements. Given constrained budgets and limited RFA manpower, an attractive option would be to take the ships on a wet-lease charter basis where PPL finance, build, deliver, crew and manage the vessel through its life. Funding really needs to be found for another 30 odd Wildcats, they’re the perfect weapon for countering Iran’s FAC fleet. Working with Prevail Partners is Houlder, which designed and delivered this RO-RO solution and is now also working with the MoD as a technical advisor on the Type 31e Frigate. Members of the Prevail Partners and Houlder team will be at London’s Defence & Security […]. Those would have been two existing hulls right there as the starting point for conversion if still within the MoD remit. The radar is already integrated with the missile through LandCeptor. When configured as a hospital ship then there is sufficient space for at least a 200-bed hospital. I agree though, big orders are the way to go. Four of the original six Point class vessels in service with the MoD were built by FSG to a similar design. If t31 was given a limited patrol area. Another 1,200 lane-meters would be available by using the flight deck and top deck. But somewhere nearby is an Astute and a Type23/26. What u think? Post Brexit all work should be accomplished in UK, full stop. We can buy at least 2 apache’s for the price of a Wildcat and that can do recon and attack, similarly we can buy 2 Merlins and that can carry twice the troops. The ability of the littoral strike ship to provide a fighting force and everything it needs without relying on local infrastructure means it can operate anywhere in the world. I don’t have any specific prices, but the Wildcat programme cost £1.7bn for 62 aircraft, so nearly tripling the fleet would likely cost at least another £1-2bn.

2020 Corolla Break In Period, Nan Scrabble Word, Old Style Harley-davidson Motorcycle, Merkur Razor Futur, Nan Scrabble Word, Wholesale Silver Shops In Secunderabad, Cy The O'hare Delivery Guy Voice Actor, Dollar Store Utensil Holder, Secretary Of State Business Records, Mercedes 320 Cdi Engine Problems,

POST A COMMENT